Which principle supports the idea of failing fast and iterating?

The principle that supports the idea of failing fast and iterating is centered around delivering small increments of value to gather quick feedback. This approach allows teams to experiment with new ideas in a limited scope, meaning they can quickly assess what works and what doesn’t. By focusing on small, manageable increments, teams can reduce the risk associated with larger, more complex development cycles.

This principle is integral to Agile practices because it emphasizes the importance of customer input and adaptability. When teams deliver small increments, stakeholders can provide feedback that informs subsequent iterations, allowing for more refined and relevant features. This not only accelerates learning but also helps teams pivot quickly when initial assumptions prove incorrect, embodying the "fail fast" ideology by effectively learning from mistakes early in the development process.

In contrast, focusing on extensive documentation or limiting iterations could slow down the response to change and user feedback, countering the advantages provided by fast iteration cycles. Prioritizing feature requests without incorporating user feedback could lead to deliverables that do not meet actual user needs, which is also contrary to the iterative development principle.